Who’s afraid of the RTI Act?

Exposure is something everyone fears; façade, although damaging, provides a comfort

a comment on the theme of famous play “Who’s afraid of Virginia Woolf”

Well, who isn’t? Only, some of those who want to be saved from this Act are ‘more equal than others’. These people are at the pinnacle of some ‘pillar of democracy’. And while they are happy to throw search lights at all other lower forms of life, they are not comfortable if the spot light tries to find their private properties, their meetings, their allowances, etc.

The UPA spokespersons never tire of counting the RTI act as proof of its pro-people stance. No public meeting of the first family ever ends without admonishment to congressmen about using the RTI Act. Yet, the mighty and the powerful fall over each other to claim that the RTI Act is not applicable to them in its totality.

The ‘leaders of the society’ argue that RTI is fine for everyone else but their own position is too sacrosanct to allow peeping toms to disturb their peace. Actually, what they are saying is easy to understand. It is the residue of imperialistic mentality – that the common people can not presume to question the ruling class. And that the ruled should be thankful to the rulers for ruling them with an iron fist. But this does not sound politically correct. And therefore they have to go to absurd length to prove that the RTI Act does not apply to them. Or that it should not apply to them. In this article, I plan to make a small list of agencies who feel that RTI is not for them – and the fantastic reasoning they dare offer.

But before that, without going into legalese, let us see whom the law applies – as per the provisions of law.

Section 2(h) of the RTI Act defines Public Authority As

any authority or body or institution of self- government established or constituted—

a)      by or under the Constitution; (Supreme Court, Lok Sabha,….)

b)      by any other law made by Parliament; (LIC, Nationalised banks, NHRC, ….)

 c)      by any other law made by State Legislature; (State transport corp, Universities…, )

d)      by notification issued or order made by the appropriate Government, and includes any—

  1. 1.    body owned, controlled or substantially financed; (granted schools)
  2. 2.    non-Government organization substantially financed, directly or indirectly by funds provided by the appropriate Government;

Actually, this should be easy to understand, unless you are a lawyer with a brief to hold. But each and every word has been twisted and turned, to make them unrecognizable.  Now, let us see the authorities that have claimed full or partial and non-applicability of the RTI Act.

The most fantastic reasoning that I have come across is put forward by the Calcutta High Court. It says that it was not established by constitution or parliament, but was established by ‘her majesty, the Queen of England’, even before the constitution was written. Therefore, their lordships felt, the RTI Act of India is not applicable to them. The Central Information Commission has already dismissed the argument. (read here)

The second high placed office is the Prime Ministers National Relief Fund. They argued that as they are not funded by any government, they are not a public authority, and the RTI Act does not apply to them. The Central Information Commission had to remind them that they were a part of Prime Minister’s office, and serving IAS officer worked as PMNRF’s secretary. His salary is paid out of public funds by the PMO. The lavish space they use also belongs to government. And therefore, they have to give information about donations given at the time of tsunami disaster. It was after this order by Supreme Court that PMNRF accepted that it has collected 800 crores, but spent nothing. Now you know why they were avoiding public scrutiny.

In the next part, we will go thru more examples of VIPs trying to free themselves from clutches of RTI. Usually because they have something serious to hide. They are not the clerks and junior officers an RTI applicant usually meets and fights with. They are not who have to obey the law. They are the makers and keepers of legal system. So, they feel, that they are above what they have created. And unless we convey them that we the people of India want this law, and want it in full, they will just continue to take us for a ride.

Advertisements

9 thoughts on “Who’s afraid of the RTI Act?

  1. subhash b patil July 23, 2011 / 7:58 pm

    dear atul,
    hope.. no i am sure.. you remember me.
    i heartily congratulate you for gaining the readership exceeding 5000 nos
    i have also been working in ZPs for their QMS and find the mockery of this act from both sides.. shirking of officers and misuse by citizens.
    once again, congratulations to you. how is nashik?
    i met sudhir in vijnan bharati karyakram. i came to nashik for two days latter for zp work.
    met shri balasaheb dikshit in VKA karyalay.
    i have given three books to him.pl take first opportunity to see those. namaskar to all ABVP and other brothers.

  2. ravi bhangaonkar July 21, 2011 / 5:18 pm

    People, govt officers particularly, always try to shirk away from the responsibility. (Forget about accountability for their various deeds.) The height is some babu replies that the PM’s fund does not come under RTI, is height of it. In fact the authority replying in such irresponsible way must be punished.

  3. Milind July 18, 2011 / 2:47 pm

    very well said.
    waiting for part II…

  4. Dr.S.N.Venkatesan July 16, 2011 / 8:17 pm

    I am a RTI Trainer in AIM Chennai. I have delivered more than 500 lectures on RTI Act to various level officers both in Government Departments and in Public Sectors. To my experience, only government servants are afraid about this Act, particularly to Section 20 of RTI Act, 2005.

    Yours faithfully,
    Dr.S.N.Venkatesan,
    Chennai

  5. deepak kulkarni July 16, 2011 / 3:39 pm

    in 21st century ,still some persons are acting as, non transparency is their religion.they are the counterpart of that ancient brhamanism.where the knowledge of veda was held criminal.i think those people in this era are following the rules of outdated” Manusmruti.”so let us declare the shame on such sh rude,stone age mentality.common people are getting wisdom.i am positively hopeful.after freedom the black rulers are consistently trying to cultivate slave mentality among common people.as per the revolutionary quotes by Dr.Babasaheb Ambedkar.”people should come to know that they are used as slaves,as they will come to know the facts,the revolution will occur.i believe in that “every cloud has its own silvery edge.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s